| March 2004 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |||
Ann Coulter as always makes a great point:
Before he was put into office because he supported policies favored by al-Qaida terrorists, appeasement candidate Zapatero said: “I want Kerry to win.” Kerry is also supported by North Korean dictator Kim Jong Il, who broadcasts Kerry speeches over Radio Pyongyang with favorable commentary.So now Kerry really does have two foreign leaders on record supporting him: a Socialist terrorist-appeaser and a Marxist mass murderer...
That’s my opinion. He can’t stand up to stuff like this:
...Cheney said: “Of the many nations that have joined our coalition, allies and friends of the United States, Senator Kerry speaks with open contempt. “Great Britain, Australia, Italy, Spain, Poland, and more than 20 other nations have contributed and sacrificed for the freedom of the Iraqi people,” Cheney said in a speech at the Ronald Reagan Library in Simi Valley, California. “Senator Kerry calls these countries, quote, ‘window-dressing’. They are in his words, a coalition of the coerced and the bribed. Cheney went on: “How would Senator Kerry describe Great Britain? Coerced, or bribed? Or Italy, which recently lost 19 citizens killed by terrorists in Najaf. “Was Italy’s contribution just window-dressing?”... Kerry has since said that the president decieved Congress into passing the vote. But Cheney said: “Had the decision belonged to Senator Kerry, Saddam hussein would still be in power today in Iraq. “In fact, Saddam Hussein would almost certainly still be in control of Kuwait.” The vice president said: “The American people will have a clear choice in the election of 2004.” Refering to the September 11, 2001 attacks and the ensuing war on terror, Cheney said that the Republican president “has built a national security record of his own.” “He saw America through tragedy. He has kept the nation’s enemies in desperate flight. And under his leadership, our country has once again led the armies of liberation, freeing 50 million souls (in Afghanistan and Iraq) from tyranny and making our nation and the world more secure.”
Kerry’s got nothing but complaints. He’s got no answers and he’s on every side and no side of every issue except terrorism, the fight against which he wants to abandon.
The Democrats knew Bush was unbeatable and that’s one reason why all their presidential candidates have been so lame.