| May 2004 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | ||||||
| 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 |
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 |
| 30 | 31 | |||||
Even Katie Couric admits liberal control of media:
...why isn’t it fair to say that liberals, sort of, are controlling the mainstream media?
The LA TIMES has this on its front page today:
Iraq Setbacks Change Mood in Washington
Lawmakers in both parties as well as some military leaders fear the occupation is heading for failure. Bush stands firm, but U.S. goals may be scaled back.
...Weeks of military and political setbacks have produced a striking change of mood in the capital about the prospects for success in Iraq, where U.S. and allied forces are struggling to establish security to allow a new Iraqi “caretaker government” to begin work June 30.
A series of Senate hearings last week showcased the growing fears of many foreign policy experts a mood some described as “panic.”
Wow—“panic” after “weeks” of “setbacks.” That’s really something. You think we would have beaten Hitler if we panicked after weeks of setbacks? We’d all be speaking German.
Of course there aren’t any setbacks in Iraq. The actions, in Abu-Ghraib, of 20 people (13 thousandths of 1 percent of our military) are meaningless.
There’s a word for panicking in the face of little or no opposition. That word is “cowardice.”
