| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
David Horowitz concisely states:
President Owes No Apology for War
Amid all the flak over the resignation and testimony of weapons sleuth David Kay and the savage attacks on President Bush’s war decision by the Democratic contenders, the most obvious unasked question is: Why should the president be on the defensive over a war as good as this one?
Casualties were minimal, 25 million people were freed, and a brutal regime was dismantled a prison for children was liberated and mass graves stopped being filled. Why should Bush have to apologize for a war that brought Libya’s Moammar Kadafi to heel, made the Syrians and Iranians more pliant and has killed or taken into custody thousands of terrorist soldiers and allies?
In short, the war in Iraq is among one of the most justified military actions in history.
