| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
...on a gas-guzzling S.U.V.!
Tell me I’m not the only one who sees irony in that. The notion that the Iraq war is about “blood for oil” is preposterous. But if you really believe it—shouldn’t you be driving something that doesn’t burn up the maximum possible amount of oil?
#2Good to see you here, Jackalope. I like your recent blogging about Ashcroft, Lieberman, Korea, the Hajj, etc.
-Vik
You're not the only one who sees the irony. I think it was James Lileks who quipped something like, "Your crudely painted sign has shattered my entire worldview. Tell me more about your refusal to exchange bodily fluids for petrochemicals."