| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Functional Ambivalent posts:
So, as a Democrat, I’m wondering: What do we do if President Bush was right? What do we do if the Mideastern dominoes start falling and President Bush goes down in history as Winston Churchill, while we go down as Neville Chamberlain, howling weakly that diplomacy works and military force is no longer necessary? What if our most conservative President goes down in history as a greta contributor to the liberal ideals of freedom and tolerance, while we Democrats—we liberals—go down as cold-hearted and fearful, unconcerned about the suffering of our fellows while we sit contentedly in our affluence?
Rock on!
Use the Force, Luke!
Read the whole thing. It’s an excellent analysis, and it shows that some on the Left are appreciating the current achievements of GWB in the Mid-East.
(via Pejmanesque. )
#1
#2isn’t it demeaning to Arab or Middle Eastern people when Dems or Libs say that the don’t know what freedom is or that they can’t handle democracy?
I agree 100%.
Looks like some libs or leftists may be seeing the writing on the wall. That is precisely what the Reagan Revo was all about. Spread freedom through military muscle; show strength or use it as a last resort. Some call it the NeoCon movement. Diplomacy is a failed tool when evil people want to kill you. BTW: isn't it demeaning to Arab or Middle Eastern people when Dems or Libs say that the don't know what freedom is or that they can't handle democracy?