| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Since the leadership on the Left currently define themselves as anything Bush is not (a rather hollow position), naturally we see this article today:
Furor over Bush’s 9/11 ad The Bush reelection campaign yesterday unveiled its first three campaign commercials showcasing Ground Zero images, angering some 9/11 families who accused President Bush of exploiting the tragedy for political advantage. “It’s a slap in the face of the murders of 3,000 people,” said Monica Gabrielle, whose husband died in the twin tower attacks. “It is unconscionable.” Gabrielle and several other family members said the injury was compounded by Bush’s refusal to testify in open session before the 9/11 commission. “I would be less offended if he showed a picture of himself in front of the Statue of Liberty,” said Tom Roger, whose daughter was a flight attendant on doomed American Airlines Flight 11. “But to show the horror of 9/11 in the background, that’s just some advertising agency’s attempt to grab people by the throat.”
So Bush isn’t supposed to refer to 9/11 in the campaign for President? He isn’t supposed to show any visual reference to it in the TV ads? The Left would love to prevent Bush from referring to this in any way. They’re aware of how much the American people appreciate Bush’s leadership in this time of war. They know they can’t win on this subject. And their response is, to try to keep him from talking about it. Good luck.
