March 2010
S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

"We're really blessed in this country to have the Judeo-Christian tradition of wanting to love each other and help each other have better lives and to enjoy life and be good to each other. As opposed to the tradition of some Islamofascist localities where they do the reverse - sending their own children off to be blown up."
The Big Picture, 4/29/04.
Recent Comments
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    Travesti on Gay Marriage Movement -- Okay, Now I See How This Is Going to Go. .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
Archives
  • January 2010
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003

  • Complete Archives
  • Categories
  • Category Archives
  • All articles: emphasis added unless otherwise noted.
    Quotation for fair use welcomed. Links appreciated.
    Copyright © 2003 - 2009 Vik Rubenfeld.
    HostingMatters_button.png
    ExpEng.png

    October 15, 2008

    Crush the Obamamedia Narrative: Deregulation Did Not Cause the Financial Crisis

    [The title of this post is inspired by that of Michelle Malkin's powerful post, "Crush the Obamedia narrative: Look who’s 'gripped by insane rage'"]

    Yesterday a good friend of mine told me that he had heard, and regarded it as common knowledge, that deregulation was the cause of the bad home mortgages that are key to the current financial crisis. So evidently this blatant canard, put forward by Obama, has not yet been widely enough debunked.

    When Obama says that deregulation is the cause of the bad home loans, he is not speaking accurately, and he knows it. In fact, it was government regulation that caused it. From Investors Business Daily (link):

    In 1977, President Carter and a Democrat Congress created the Community Reinvestment Act mandating that banks must meet the credit needs of everyone in the banks' community, including uncreditworthy borrowers. It was done for a good social purpose and had the greatest intentions - expanding home ownership. And, through the 1980s and into the 1990s at least, it seemed to work.

    However in 1995, President Bill Clinton imposed more and stronger regulations and performance tests. These coerced banks into significantly increasing their loans to low-income borrowers in economically-troubled communities, or face possible fines and expansion restrictions.

    These new rules encouraged banks to bundle their risky subprime loans together with prime loans and re-sell them in packages to other financial institutions, thereby freeing the original lenders from any further risk. Thanks to the new rules and oversight from the CRA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac got involved in a big way, buying literally trillions of dollars of the questionable loans from banks and feeding the dangerous cycle that had begun.

    Eventually, it turned into a kind of pyramid scheme that overwhelmed some lending organizations when housing prices softened in late 2006 and 2007.

    So what's the big lesson to be learned here by the public? That this financial crisis was the result of yet another Big Government program that had great intentions but created devastating unintended consequences that hurt millions of people.

    It was not the fault of African American groups, which naturally want to help their people. Nor was it the fault of America's free enterprise system, or a lack of enough regulation. No, it was Big Government once again trying to run a private industry.

    You can't take one dollar and loan it 50 times. Watch out when Big Government spenders tell you they can run our entire medical industry, give you far better care and save you lots of money.

    From the Wall Street Journal (link):

    Jimmy Carter signed the Community Reinvestment Act into law in 1977. The Clinton administration turned this Act, a once-obscure and lightly enforced banking regulation law, into one of the most powerful mandates shaping American cities and, as Senate Banking Committee chairman Phil Gramm memorably put it, a vast extortion scheme against the nation's banks. Under its provisions, U.S. banks have committed nearly $1 trillion for inner-city and low-income mortgages and real estate development projects, most of it funneled through a nationwide network of left-wing community groups, intent, in some cases, on teaching their low-income clients that the financial system is their enemy and, implicitly, that government, rather than their own striving, is the key to their well-being. Thus it was made practically compulsory for an investment bank to loan mortgage money to literally anyone who came along or face the wrath of government bureaucracy. The banks were so pressed to abide by this government mandate that they felt the need to offer a new kind of loan to make their product appear even more attractive the sub prime loan. Thus the story goes on.

    For the next ten years, the banks were forced to abide by the law and deliver their quota of minority and subsistence wage earner loans. When I say subsistence wage earner loans, I mean that the banks were forced to accept Social Security and unemployment payments as earned income for mortgage purposes. Some companies quit asking for income verification altogether and provided the now infamous 'liar loans' simply to meet some government standard set by national legislative fiat. Meantime, we the people made hay on the stock market and congratulated ourselves on how smart we were and how well we were doing.

    Obama was part of forcing the banks to make these bad loans. From the NY Post (link):

    WHAT exactly does a "community organizer" do? Barack Obama's rise has left many Americans asking themselves that question. Here's a big part of the answer: Community organizers intimidate banks into making high-risk loans to customers with poor credit.

    In the name of fairness to minorities, community organizers occupy private offices, chant inside bank lobbies, and confront executives at their homes - and thereby force financial institutions to direct hundreds of millions of dollars in mortgages to low-credit customers.

    In other words, community organizers help to undermine the US economy by pushing the banking system into a sinkhole of bad loans. And Obama has spent years training and funding the organizers who do it.

    THE seeds of today's financial meltdown lie in the Community Reinvestment Act - a law passed in 1977 and made riskier by unwise amendments and regulatory rulings in later decades.

    CRA was meant to encourage banks to make loans to high-risk borrowers, often minorities living in unstable neighborhoods. That has provided an opening to radical groups like ACORN (the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now) to abuse the law by forcing banks to make hundreds of millions of dollars in "subprime" loans to often uncreditworthy poor and minority customers.

    ...Chicago ACORN sought out Obama's legal services for a "motor voter" case and partnered with him on his 1992 "Project VOTE" registration drive.

    In those years, he also conducted leadership-training seminars for ACORN's up-and-coming organizers. That is, Obama was training the army of ACORN organizers who participated in Madeline Talbott's drive against Chicago's banks.

    More than that, Obama was funding them. As he rose to a leadership role at Chicago's Woods Fund, he became the most powerful voice on the foundation's board for supporting ACORN and other community organizers. In 1995, the Woods Fund substantially expanded its funding of community organizers - and Obama chaired the committee that urged and managed the shift.

    ...The Woods Fund report makes it clear Obama was fully aware of the intimidation tactics used by ACORN's Madeline Talbott in her pioneering efforts to force banks to suspend their usual credit standards. Yet he supported Talbott in every conceivable way. He trained her personal staff and other aspiring ACORN leaders, he consulted with her extensively, and he arranged a major boost in foundation funding for her efforts.

    And, as the leader of another charity, the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, Obama channeled more funding Talbott's way - ostensibly for education projects but surely supportive of ACORN's overall efforts.

    In return, Talbott proudly announced her support of Obama's first campaign for state Senate, saying, "We accept and respect him as a kindred spirit, a fellow organizer."

    IN short, to understand the roots of the subprime-mort gage crisis, look to ACORN's Madeline Talbott. And to see how Talbott was able to work her mischief, look to Barack Obama.

    Then you'll truly know what community organizers do.

    Obama was a lawyer in a lawsuit against CitiBank to force it to make these same kinds of bad loans. From the Chicago Sun-Times (link):

    Obama represented Calvin Roberson in a 1994 lawsuit against Citibank, charging the bank systematically denied mortgages to African-American applicants and others from minority neighborhoods.

    John McCain opposed what was going on at Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in 2006. Here's the letter, signed by McCain and other Republicans - but not by one Democrat. The Democrats killed this effort, which could have mitigated, or perhaps even averted, this crisis. (link):

     

    McCain made a speech to Senate about this later on May 25, 2006, warning:

    I join as a cosponsor of the Federal Housing Enterprise Regulatory Reform Act of 2005, S. 190, to underscore my support for quick passage of GSE regulatory reform legislation. If Congress does not act, American taxpayers will continue to be exposed to the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole. 

    The bill never got out of committee.

    In the first presidential debate, Obama claimed that he had also warned about the impending crisis:

    Two years ago, I warned that, because of the subprime lending mess, because of the lax regulation, that we were potentially going to have a problem and tried to stop some of the abuses in mortgages that were taking place at the time.

    Last year, I wrote to the secretary of the Treasury to make sure that he understood the magnitude of this problem and to call on him to bring all the stakeholders together to try to deal with it.

    The letter he is referring to appears to be here. The letter asks Paulson "to convene a homeownership preservation summit" to discuss, among other things, more requirements from the banks, not less - including, requirements for banks to "intervene" in (i.e. pay for) loans that that the loan-holders, can no longer afford:

    How to facilitate and encourage appropriate intervention by loan servicing companies at the earliest signs of borrower difficulty.

    Obama's statement that he warned of the crisis and attempted to fix it is inaccurate. Obama warned of the crisis and proposed changes that would have worsened the financial harm to the banks.

    Conclusion: People need to be aware that deregulation was not the cause of the bad home loans that brought on the financial crisis; it was wrongful regulations that forced banks to make these bad loans to people who were not in a position to repay them.



    Replies: 5 comments

    Your comments are welcome. Abusive remarks and trolls may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of The Big Picture.

    Christopher Hain   on  10/18/08  at  08:10 PM   United States  #1

    I'm not an Obama fan, and I love your Penn & Teller video on Obama and the Captial Gains Tax issue. However, capitalism needs stringent regulations -- just ask Adam Smith. And while deregulation didn't cause our financial crisis, it removed necessary roadblocks to the inherent negative side of capitalism.

    Captialism can be a powerful force that channels the inherent human motive of self-interest for the good of all. But if it's not strictly, regulated capitalism destroys all. This is not a socialist idea, but a capitalist one. (Again, just ask Adam Smith.) And while it's true that too much regulation will stifle capitalism, too little will destroy society.

    In short, regulated capitalism isn't socialism, it's capitalism. Unregulated capitalism is anarchy.



      on  10/19/08  at  05:34 AM   United States  #2

    I am not a fan of Obama or any Democrat, the party that has a rich history of telling all minoritys what victims they are and "vote for us and we will give you handouts and quotas."  The latest being this Acorn Subprime mess as the Democrats have used them to force lenders to make these loans to people who could not pay, and then made the taxpayers liable for Freddie and Fannie.  In the previous back and forth below in a different venue, watch and rewatch the video detailing the attempts by John McCain and the republicans trying to get regulation on Freddie and Fannie, and how the Democrats resisted it over and over.  And don't tell me that republicans are also involved as lobbyists, I know that and a I want them ALL locked up, and I want the money back.  Be sure you listen to Bill Clinton at the end.  And be sure you listen to Ms. California Freeloading praise the "Excellent stewardship of Frank Raines," in the latest case of Democrats trying to give minorities a free ride for votes.  Charles Barkley said "poor people have been voting for Democrats for 50 years and they are still poor."  If I were black and I saw Acorn and the Democrats trying to register blacks on the premise that simply because I am black I will vote for Obama, I would be insulted, as that implys that I am stupid.  And be sure you do not miss the comment during one hearing "How many of you are being paid off by Freddie/Fannie?"  I would like to know the answer to that question, and I want them locked up.  And I want Frank Raines locked up, and the $90 million back to the taxpayers. So relax, and enjoy the video below:

    This is why there is so much unease about our financial system.  The Democrats, the promisers of handouts to all that will vote for them.  Electing idiots to office, not limited to Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.  Watch the following video at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MGT_cSi7Rs and then read the below.  See if you get the picture.  Of course the Democrats are blowing this smokescreen saying it was the Republican’s fault. Subject: FW: More Acorns A Democratic monopoly of Congress and the White House will bring lots more of the same.  You will not read this in the NY Times.  That's for sure.   

    HOW does Barack Obama fit into all of this? Obama has been a key ally of Chicago ACORN going back to his days as a community organizer.

    Later, as a young lawyer, he offered leadership training to the activists who were forcing Chicago banks into high-risk subprime loans. And when he made it on to the boards of Chicago's Woods Fund and the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, he channeled money ACORN's way.

    Obama was perfectly aware of ACORN's intimidation tactics - indeed, he oversaw a Woods Fund report that boasted of managing to fund the radical group despite its shocking behavior.  ACORN also continues its shady ways, using a vast network of technically separate but in fact quite interconnected organizations to evade federal laws on the politicized use of government money.

    Stanley Kurtz is a senior fellow with the Ethics and Public Policy Center in Washington.



      on  10/23/08  at  01:57 PM   United States  #3

    Obama said just yesterday that part of his plan to fix the economy is to 'make lending available to all.'

    It's the same socialist ideology that got us into this mess.  It's done in the name of equalization, not equality. 

    It we were all treated equally then we would all be held to the same standards.



    Grand Pubah   on  05/04/09  at  03:14 PM   United States  #4

    Obama's Senate gov site and the document has disappeared.



      on  05/05/09  at  03:37 AM   United States  #5

    Well the below link is still up, it reveals Obama's real agenda:  re-distribution of wealth, socialism, those who do paying for the mortgages and health care and everything else of those who do not.  Charity is good, to an extent, but handouts and using government to take from some to give to others is not what America is (was?) all about.  Welfare and handouts may provide money but they do not provide any skills that can be put onto a resume, and this has had disastrous results for blacks since the War on Poverty since the 1960s.

    What it really is, but Obama knows better than call it this, it is Slavery Reparations.  Universal Health Care is but a euphemism for those who do paying for the health care of those who do not.  To some extent, this is already being done, with the medicade tax on paychecks and the billing system where tens of thousands of dollars are charged for operating rooms as you are being charged for those who do not pay.  The Democrats now want to include (already are in many instances) illegal immigrants into this health plan.  See

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iivL4c_3pck

    and then consider what Thomas Sowell said on page 454 of Ever Wonder Why:  "It is self - destructive for any society to create a situation where a baby who is born into the world automatically has pre-existing grievances against another baby born at the same time, because of what their ancestors did centuries ago.  It is hard enough to solve our own problems, without trying to solve our ancestor's problems."





    Enter a New Comment Here.
    Smileys



    Name:

    Email:

    URL:

    Remember my personal information

    Notify me of follow-up comments?


    This helps us keep spammers from commenting. Thanks for your help!
    Please submit the word you see below: