May 2012
S M T W T F S
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

"We're really blessed in this country to have the Judeo-Christian tradition of wanting to love each other and help each other have better lives and to enjoy life and be good to each other. As opposed to the tradition of some Islamofascist localities where they do the reverse - sending their own children off to be blown up."
The Big Picture, 4/29/04.
Recent Comments
    Tony on California Gubernatorial Candidate Angelides says Education is Underfunded (at $18,000 per Student!) .
———
    .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on Cutest Cat Pictures in History? .
———
    .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on A "Religion"? Muslim Cleric on TV Describes the Correct Method for Wife Beatings in Islam .
———
    .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on Why Liberals Use Insults and Why Their Arguments Sound Illogical - The Final Answer .
———
    .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on A "Religion"? Muslim Cleric on TV Describes the Correct Method for Wife Beatings in Islam .
———
    .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on Islamists Protest Against U.S. Freedom of Speech at U.C. Irvine .
———
    Paul Salahuddin Armstrong on A "Religion"? Muslim Cleric on TV Describes the Correct Method for Wife Beatings in Islam .
———
    .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on A "Religion"? Muslim Cleric on TV Describes the Correct Method for Wife Beatings in Islam .
———
    .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on Hitler's Nurse Talks About the Last Days of the Third Reich .
———
    .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on Hitler's Nurse Talks About the Last Days of the Third Reich .
———
Archives
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • October 2010
  • August 2010
  • May 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003

  • Complete Archives
  • Categories
  • Category Archives
  • All articles: emphasis added unless otherwise noted.
    Quotation for fair use welcomed. Links appreciated.
    Copyright © 2003 - 2011 Vik Rubenfeld.
    HostingMatters_button.png
    ExpEng.png

    October 08, 2003

    Does the LA TIMES Believe in Democracy?

    That’s a reasonable question today, seeing how many times their front page repudiates the decision of the people in the election. Quotes from front page stories in today’s edition:

    In a popular revolt unmatched in the 92 years that Californians have held the power to recall elected officials, voters chose a Republican film star with no government experience to replace a Democrat steeped for three decades in state politics.

    That’s the second paragraph of the lead story today. The disdain for the will of the people is right there. Later in the same story:

    The national implications of Schwarzenegger’s victory were quickly apparent. Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, a presidential candidate who hopes to tap into the same popular anger that propelled the recall, said Californians had vented “their frustration with the country’s direction.”

    “Come next November, that anger might be directed at a different incumbent … in the White House,” he said in a statement.

    It doesn’t say that that’s just the opinion of Dean – the TIMES says these are “the national implications”.

    And then there’s this slam, also on the front page:

    THE NEW GOVERNOR

    So Familiar Yet So Unknown

    Californians have never known more about a new governor. We’ve seen him naked on screen. We know about the Nazi father, the celebrity journalist wife, the bodybuilding titles and the crude behavior toward women. We have seen him in theaters, fallen asleep to his voice on television and imitated his accent.

    Californians have never known less about a new governor. We’ve never seen him hold office. We don’t know what programs he’ll cut, how he’ll balance the budget, how he’ll negotiate with recalcitrant legislators or how he’ll manage the state’s bureaucracy.

    Lawyers, business people, doctors, even actors leave behind their professions for politics. Arnold Schwarzenegger at various times the most physically developed man in the world, Hollywood’s most famous actor and soon the 38th governor of California has made the switch too, with one critical difference. He is bringing his lifetime of personas, real and fictional, with him to office.

    Schwarzenegger, who built his career on changing shape, could claim during his campaign to be just about anything.

    Three slams against the people’s choice, on the front page of the paper, the day after the election.

    Bias before the election is one thing. These stories imply a rejection of the people’s will, and of American democracy itself.

    Is the TIMES no longer a team player?


    Enter Your Comments Here:

    Your comments are welcome. Abusive remarks and trolls may be deleted. Opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of The Big Picture.



    Enter a New Comment Here.
    Smileys



    Name:

    Email:

    URL:

    Remember my personal information

    Notify me of follow-up comments?


    This helps us keep spammers from commenting. Thanks for your help!
    Please submit the word you see below: