| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
GWB IS STILL SAYING he expects the U.N. multinational force to prevent Hezbollah from attacking Israel:
"One thing is for certain, is that when this force goes in to help Lebanon, Hezbollah won't have that safe haven or that kind of freedom to run in Lebanon's southern border," he said.
It looks like last week's analysis here was correct. GWB and Condi seem to really believe there's a chance that a U.N. force could accomplish something, other than, to create chaos and tacitly support the enemies of the West.
According to ynetnews . . .
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3293994,00.html
"Shortly after the UN force deploys, Washington plans to push for another Security Council resolution that will instruct the multinational force to disarm Hizbullah"
Is this why the Europeans are getting cold feet about committing troops to UNIFL?