| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
(Posted here by permission.) It’s fascinating to be able to have conversations with people on the other side of the world, which in cases like this would have been impossible not too long ago. Last night I got to IM’ing with a friend in India about his country’s experience with Islam.
On the history of India and Pakistan, which were formerly one nation: “Pak went Muslim way, and now known more as a rogue state, lagging in all the areas. ...India despite a huge population, is the shining star on economy front…”
Yesterday I posted about the Jihadist method of immigrating into a society, but not assimilating into it, so that the target society is forced to change and become more Islamic. I was curious about the assimilation of Muslims into India’s Hindu society. It turns out that they are so notably not assimilating, that the subject came up by itself:
I asked specifically about Muslim assimilation into Hindu society:
How Islamist history is seen as reflecting on Islam in India: ”...we see all bloodshed in the world (except Sri Lanka) where at least one party is Muslim.”
Interesting, isn’t it?
