| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
Many have discussed the “disgraceful” and “poisonous” comments of British MP George Galloway, calling for England to accede to the intimidation of the terrorists and withdraw troops from Iraq. Few here have noted that Galloway was elected in a district that has ‘a huge Muslim population.’ Galloway won his seat in part by appealing to the Muslim vote.
Because England made the tragic error of permitting massive immigration of Muslims, many of whom refuse to assimilate and explicitly or tacitly support the terrorist killings of British civilians, Galloway’s district has enough people in it with such views, to have elected an MP who supports the terrorists by calling for England to accede to the terrorists’ demands.
What this means to the U.S.: in order to avoid the possibility of similar effects on politics here, it is advisable to curtail immigration to the U.S. from Muslim nations until the war on terror is over.
#1
Would this apply to all those from Muslim nations or just the Muslims?