March 2010
S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

"We're really blessed in this country to have the Judeo-Christian tradition of wanting to love each other and help each other have better lives and to enjoy life and be good to each other. As opposed to the tradition of some Islamofascist localities where they do the reverse - sending their own children off to be blown up."
The Big Picture, 4/29/04.
Recent Comments
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    Travesti on Gay Marriage Movement -- Okay, Now I See How This Is Going to Go. .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
    on John Quincy Adams, and Winston Churchill, on Radical Islam .
———
Archives
  • January 2010
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003

  • Complete Archives
  • Categories
  • Category Archives
  • All articles: emphasis added unless otherwise noted.
    Quotation for fair use welcomed. Links appreciated.
    Copyright © 2003 - 2009 Vik Rubenfeld.
    HostingMatters_button.png
    ExpEng.png

    November 09, 2007

    Credit Reporting Data Reveals the Number of Illegal Aliens in the U.S.: 17 million

    (By the way - I'm seriously jonesing to get back to more frequent blogging. I'm working mega-hours on a business project. In the meantime, this is too good to miss.)

    Technology writer Robert X. Cringely has a column this week on the use of credit reporting data to get a fix on the number of illegal aliens in the U.S.:

    While politicians and the U.S. Census Bureau may disagree on how many illegal aliens are living in the United States, the big credit reporting agencies have a pretty solid handle on the number and it is 17 million. That's 17 million adults of unproved nationality who have ongoing financial relationships with businesses or - believe it or not - governments. It's likely that there is some duplication in this total number, that is an illegal alien who is counted twice because he has, for example, a different relationship with his electric utility than he does with his phone company. But since the 17 million figure doesn't include children, the two are likely to wash out and 17 million is probably pretty darned close to the real number.

    ...A lot of this sleuthing comes down to a surprising artifact, the Social Security number. One would think that surprising for an economic class of people best known for not having Social Security numbers. Ah, but they do have Social Security numbers, just not their own. You need a Social Security number to sign up for utility services, for example. No Social Security number, no electricity, gas, phone, or satellite TV. So what's a poor alien to do? They go down to some local hangout and BUY a Social Security number to give to the utility. This has to be a legitimate number or it won't fly with utility computer systems, but does it have to be the customer's own number? Good question.

    Here's where we have an interesting business ethics issue. Say you are the electric company and someone tries to set up service using a Social Security number that already exists in your database and is clearly borrowed, bought, stolen, or simply made up. What do you do? Most utilities go ahead and set up the account, because to them what counts is whether the new customer will actually pay that bill and it turns out that people operating on such borrowed numbers are more reliable bill payers than the rest of us. They can't afford to get in trouble with the electric company because that would draw attention to them. So there is a tacit agreement between the parties that a Social Security number must be provided because that's the rule, but if it happens to be someone else's Social Security number, well that's okay.

    The funny thing about this is the impact it has to have on the person who was originally assigned that Social Security number by the U.S. government. Rather than hurt their credit it actually helps because there is so much evidence that they are good at paying their bills.

    Of course the credit bureau notices something and that's why they are so able to estimate numbers in the first place. They know what Social Security numbers are being overused and can probably even trace the genealogy of that number as it makes its way across the country. Here's an amazing fact: some individual Social Security numbers are in use right now by UP TO 3,000 PEOPLE and it isn't at all unusual for a borrowed number to be used by 200-1,000 people at the same time. Remember that most of these folks AREN'T illegal aliens.

    Meanwhile we have an AP report today that plague - the freaking plague disease, that for U.S. citizens has been a thing consigned to the dark ages of history - is making a resurgence:

    Health officials in Arizona warned in September that the plague appeared to be on the rise and that more cases were likely after an Apache County woman was infected with the disease.

    That case, the first human infection reported in Arizona since 2000, followed the discovery of an outbreak of the disease in prairie dogs in Flagstaff in August.

    Arizona health officials have been wary about a plague outbreak because of greater activity in New Mexico and other nearby states in the past year.

    A.P. tries to spin this as if plague comes from animals:

    Plague is transmitted primarily by fleas and direct contact with infected animals. When the disease causes pneumonia, it can be transmitted from an infected person to a non-infected person by airborne cough droplets.

    But if that's the case, why is it coming back now, after being considered a thing of the past within the living memory of today's citizens?

    The answer may be in illegal immigrants who avoid health checks as they enter the country. Chris Burgard reports in his excellent film, "Border," that illegal immigrants are entering the country with diseases such as tuberculosis and leprosy.

    The film is available on DVD. You can read my review of it here.