June 2005
S M T W T F S
      1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30    

"We're really blessed in this country to have the Judeo-Christian tradition of wanting to love each other and help each other have better lives and to enjoy life and be good to each other. As opposed to the tradition of some Islamofascist localities where they do the reverse - sending their own children off to be blown up."
The Big Picture, 4/29/04.
Recent Comments
    on "What Accounts For The Almost Psychotic Aversion To Knowledge About Islam?" .
———
    on Ex-Radical Dr. Tawfik Hamid on The True Cause of the Arab-Israeli Conflict .
———
    on How We Know the Government Hasn't Yet Caught Up with the Tactics of Radical Islam .
———
    on The Best iPhone 4 Case .
———
    on The Matrix Reloaded: What the Heck did the Architect Say? .
———
    on How We Know the Government Hasn't Yet Caught Up with the Tactics of Radical Islam .
———
    on In Honor of "Everybody Draw Mohammed Day" .
———
    UESB on A Warning to All Young Women Wishing to Meet a Dark Handsome Middle Eastern Man .
———
    on What the Koran Really Says about Non-Muslims .
———
    on Rumsfeld Summons Europe to Face the Islamofascist Threat .
———
Archives
  • August 2010
  • May 2010
  • March 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005
  • December 2004
  • November 2004
  • October 2004
  • September 2004
  • August 2004
  • July 2004
  • June 2004
  • May 2004
  • April 2004
  • March 2004
  • February 2004
  • January 2004
  • December 2003
  • November 2003
  • October 2003
  • September 2003
  • August 2003
  • July 2003
  • June 2003
  • May 2003
  • April 2003
  • March 2003

  • Complete Archives
  • Categories
  • Category Archives
  • All articles: emphasis added unless otherwise noted.
    Quotation for fair use welcomed. Links appreciated.
    Copyright © 2003 - 2009 Vik Rubenfeld.
    HostingMatters_button.png
    ExpEng.png

    Welcome! You are reading the archives. Click here to visit the Home page and see the latest articles.


    June 30, 2005

    STUDENT GETS F GRADE FOR MENTIONING GOD:

    The mother of four from Apple Valley, Calif., [Bethany Hauf] is now demanding an apology from the school, as well as a regrading of her 10-page report.

    “I don’t lose my First Amendment rights when I walk into that college,” she said.

    ...”I have one limiting factor – no mention of big ‘G’ gods, i.e., one, true god argumentation,” [Professor] Shefchik stated.

    ...Judy Solis, chair of the English department, says Hauf was given three options: submit the report with God included, make revisions and edit out the G-word, or rewrite the entire report.

    “She continued to write her paper,” Solis told the Press. “She knew what the consequences were.”

    Bethany has contacted, and is being support by, an organization called the American Center for Law & Justice.

    ...”Bethany’s paper discusses some of the evidences supporting a hypothesis that, while the Constitution prohibits an established church, religion was essential to the founding of the Nation and to its governance thereafter,” [Jay Sekulow, chief counsel for the ACLJ] writes.

    It sounds like a great paper.



    Zell Miller: Dean is Shrinking the Base of the Democrat Party

    Zell Miller, in a recent radio interview:

    “Probably the Republicans ought to be cheering [Dean] on, because he’s doing more harm than good for the Democrats. Here is a man who should be trying to broaden the base of his party, a party that has been shrinking now for many, many years. Instead, he is narrowing the base even more. How can you broaden the base of a party when you are talking about independents and Republicans having no sense, being evil, not working a day in their life? It is ridiculous.”



    Hussein’s Ties to Terrorists

    Saddam’s Iraq Was Motel 6 for Terrorists:

    Iraq under Saddam Hussein was a veritable Motel 6 for the world’s worst terrorists – a gang of mass murderers who had killed hundreds of Americans – well before the U.S. invaded.

    The article lists leading terrorists who were living in Iraq under Hussein.

    01:35 PM • Permalink & Comments (1)Blogroll The Big Picture!Trackbacks

    Categories: Counter-Terrorism, Iraq
    Comment thread started by: A.


    Racist Mexican Stamp

    This racist Mexican stamp fits right in with Vicente Fox’ statement that Mexican migrants do jobs “that not even blacks want to do.” It also fits in with Fox’ encouragement of his people to look down on U.S. immigration laws.

    We do need to control the borders.



    Tony Blair on the Downing Street Memos

    From AP:

    After Sept. 11, it was necessary to “draw a line in the sand here, and the country to do it with was Iraq because they were in breach of U.N. resolutions going back over many years,” [Blair] said. “I took the view that if these people ever got hold of nuclear, chemical or biological capability, they would probably use it.”

    Blair was asked about the leaked memos, which suggest strong concerns in the British government that the Bush administration was determined in 2002 to invade Iraq — months before the United States and Britain unsuccessfully sought U.N. Security Council approval for military action.

    ...According to the minutes of the meeting, Sir Richard Dearlove, then chief of Britain’s intelligence service, said the White House viewed military action against Saddam Hussein as inevitable following the Sept. 11 attacks. Bush “wanted to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD” (weapons of mass destruction), read the memo, seen by the AP. “But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.”

    In the interview, Blair said raising such concerns was a natural part of any examination of the cause for war.

    “The trouble with having a political discussion on the basis of things that are leaked is that they are always taken right out of context. Everything else is omitted from the discussion and you end up focusing on a specific document,” he said. “It would be absolutely weird if, when the Iraq issue was on the agenda, you were not constantly raising issues, trying to work them out, get them in the right place,” he said.

    I don’t get the criticism of GWB based on these memos. Is the theory that the GWB administration should not have considered military action against Iraq until the morning it went to the U.N. Security Council seeking approval to do so? Was GWB expected to seek such approval from the U.N. without wanting to get it?



    June 29, 2005

    I’ll be out of the office today, so there will be no blogging here until possibly very late tonight. See you soon.



    June 28, 2005

    Five-by-Five

    Great posts from around the blogosphere.



    An Indictment of the Dems and of Barack Obama: Obama Slams Lincoln

    Barack Obama aimed criticism at Abe Lincoln today. How pathetic, that to show himself as a future leader of the Dems, Obama felt it necessary to insult the memory of Lincoln, a man surely much greater than Obama is. It’s unbelievable that Obama should do this rather than trying to contribute something in the way of leadership or of grand ideas, to his party and his country. It’s an indictment of the paucity of leadership on the Left.

    02:11 AM • Permalink & Comments (9)Blogroll The Big Picture!Trackbacks

    Categories: Politics & Government
    Most recent ones by: A.paula.Vik Rubenfelda.


    June 27, 2005

    WEIRDEST NEWS STORY EVER:

    SCIENTISTS have created eerie zombie dogs, reanimating the canines after several hours of clinical death in attempts to develop suspended animation for humans.

    ...this should be enough to save lives such as battlefield casualties and victims of stabbings or gunshot wounds, who have suffered huge blood loss.

    ...”The results are stunning. I think in 10 years we will be able to prevent death in a certain segment of those using this technology,” said one US battlefield doctor.

    That’s just weird.



    [SUPREME] COURT: FILE-SHARING SERVICES MAY BE SUED.

    Internet file-sharing services will be held responsible if they intend for their customers to use software primarily to swap songs and movies illegally, the Supreme Court ruled Monday, rejecting warnings that the lawsuits will stunt growth of cool tech gadgets such as the next iPod.

    This looks to me like another great decision. Copyright must be protected.



    Iraqi Bloggers on the Current State of Iraq

    Don’t miss these latest posts from two leading Iraqi bloggers. From The Mesopotamian:

    Dear Friends,

    Just a quick note, to the American public: this is no time to lose heart, the fight is just now changing gear. We the Iraqis are confident of winning this battle. This so-called “insurrection” may be characterized as the “Unpopular Revolt” rather than the opposite. It is doomed to failure. We have never pretended that this can be achieved overnight. It takes time and struggle, but to those who think that the insurgency is growing I would like to say this: It is the power of the people that is growing, it is the strength and effectiveness of the new patriotic security forces that is growing, such forces that are for the first time in our history representative of the majority of the people. Time is on the side of the people and not their enemies.

    Yes, this is no time to lose heart friends.

    And from Iraq the Model:

    Now after you have probably listened to our losses through the media, I’d like to carry the news of their losses…I hate to parrot what others say.
    It’s not only us who bleed, they’re bleeding too end even more profusely and obviously the media has a purpose behind focusing on our losses while mentioning the terrorists losses in the inner pages or in many cases pretending that they don’t exist.
    Iraqi and multinational forces are still scoring victories over terrorists and here on this blog, we’d like to summarize the victories of the latest 48 hours:

    [A long list of victories against the terrorists is provided.]

    Who thinks that a war can be won without losses and sacrifices is far from reason.
    Yes, sacrifices, efforts, time and costs are all factors that make us seriously worried but we have to remind ourselves that abandoning the mission before it’s fully done would be a disaster for all of us.

    I’m positive that Iraqis have no intention of giving up and so do their allies and friends while those who think that our position is weak are actually allowing lies and illusions to control their thinking and were driven away from the larger image by the narrow image provided by the media.
    The future is ours, there’s no doubt about that and we shall win.



    Great Ruling from the Supreme Court on Ten Commandments in Courthouses - Take that, ACLU!

    The Washington Post headline—‘High Court Disallows Ten Commandments in Courthouses’—tries to make the most of the Court’s decision from the point of view of the Left. But in fact it is equally correct to say ‘High Court Allows Ten Commandments in Courthouses:’

    Sending dual signals in ruling on the separation of church and state for the first time in a quarter-century, the high court said that displays of the Ten Commandments _ like their own courtroom frieze _ are not inherently unconstitutional. But each exhibit demands scrutiny to determine whether it goes too far in amounting to a governmental promotion of religion, the court said in a case involving Kentucky courthouse exhibits.

    In effect, the court said it was taking the position that issues of Ten Commandments displays in courthouses should be resolved on a case-by-case basis.

    That’s a huge loss for the ACLU. It means: